Theology Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 2

Religious philosophy - Essay Example This paper expects to examine for what reason would a keen psyche accept or not have faith in the presence of God, and what my sentiment about the nature and presence of God is. An hour and a half discussion was held in Alys Stephens Center in Birmingham, Alabama, on October 03, 2007 between two Oxford University partners; an agnostic and mainstream humanist, Professor Richard Dawkins, and a Christian defender, Professor John Lennox. The subject of the discussion was the presence of God dependent on the skeptical perspectives that Dawkins introduced in his book, The God Delusion. In the discussion, Dawkins clarifies his postulations in regards to the dismissal of God’s presence saying that science depends on proof based grounds while confidence is visually impaired and depends only on good convictions and in this manner it hauls people to accept what is told in religion without the need of comprehension and investigating. This makes us state that an insightful brain accepts that science doesn't bolster religion; rather, it underpins logic or agnosticism. Marx origination of God’s presence is simply agnostic. He certifies that a keen brain must contend that the originator God, if there is one, must need another planner to structure him. Freud doesn't put stock in God and affirms that â€Å"the sooner one acknowledges that God doesn't exist, the better† (qtd. in McFaul 9) on the off chance that one needs to step into develop adulthood. Christianity presents risks to the presence of people as all wars and annihilations come because of the strict convictions and contrast in religions. Dawkins clarifies a contention from his book, that is, confidence is visually impaired though science is proof based (92) in which he contends that confidence is by no reasons fortifying its grounds in the 21st century when it has nothing to do with proof. Then again, as per Dawkins, â€Å"science utilizes proof to find reality with regards to the universe† and logical disclosures depend on research and

Report: Sustainability in Audi AG

Self-improvement and Careers Task 7 Environmental Sustainability in Audi AG By 1213666 To: Romas Malevicius 22. 11. 2012 Table of substance List of Figures Summary Introduction 1 Audi AG Sustainability Procedures 1. 1 Technologies 1. 2 Waste and water the executives 2. Manageability as a piece of Audi’s CSR 2. 1 Audi Environmental Foundation 2. 2 Environmental Pact for Bavaria and EMAS 2. 4 Recognition 3. Analysis 3. 1 General analysis towards the vehicle business 3. 2 â€Å"Greenwashing† Conclusions Bibliography List of figures * Figure 1. 3 p. 7 From: http://wip. audi. no/photoalbum/see/? ize=org&id=15902&type=1 (Accessed 21. 11. 2012) Summary This report covers Audi AG’s current operational and key strategies for natural manageability. It sees supportability as a major aspect of the company’s Corporate Social Responsibility and perspectives basic investigation of the car business to empower making adjusted ends. Presentation A report by the Unit ed Nations entitled Our Common Future (1987) characterized supportable advancement as ‘development, which addresses the issues of the present without trading off the capacity of people in the future to address their own issues. What's more, supposed ‘intergenerational equity’ has stayed a subject in characterizing ecological manageability. Basically it implies looking for the minimization of any antagonistic (long haul) impacts on people in the future. The point of this report is to explore the completions of the previously mentioned standards in the corporate activities of Audi AG. Audi AG is an engine vehicle maker, which involves the brands Audi, Ducati and Lamborghini. It is a global organization (MNE) that utilizes somewhere in the range of 46,000 individuals and has a yearly yield of more than 1,3 million units.Audi AG is a piece of Volkswagen Group, headquartered from Ingolstadt, Germany. 1. Audi AG Sustainability Procedures 1. 1 Technologies Audi concedes that a vehicle maker can never profess to positively affect the earth. They are, be that as it may, putting billions of pounds in capable innovations. These incorporate lightweight space outlines, diesel motors and Start-Stop advances. The motivation behind these is to diminish fuel utilization and henceforth cut CO2 emanations. 1. 2 Waste and water the board Audi’s motto ‘Advancement Through Technology’ basically plots the company’s rule of steady innovation.The brand esteems additionally express that corporate exercises are â€Å"shaped by the longing to safeguard assets and adopt a capable strategy to the environment†. They have embraced various activities to present these standards. For example, mechanical production system squander is isolated and arranged nearby and bundling is advanced in the arranging stage, which decrease transport needs significantly. Audi utilizes different wellsprings of vitality, for example, a nearby waste handling pla nt and the Combined Heat, Cooling and Power creation office (CHCP) in the Ingolstadt factory.Together they spare the organization 37,000 tons of CO2 every year. For vehicle creation the organization gathers water. They likewise feed 96. 3 percent of absolute water into a shut circle framework, so just a modest quantity of water is lost. In addition, Audi supports reusing vehicle parts and batteries. Thus their creation yield has generously expanded over the most recent two decades however generally speaking vitality use has remained basically the equivalent. Figure 1. 3. Figure 1. 3 outlines the reduction in squander water volume per vehicle in Audi’d principle creation plants in Germany between the years 1990 and 1999.The all out diminishing is 4,5m3/vehicle in Neckarsulm and correspondingly 2,3m3/vehicle in Ingolstadt. 2. Supportability as a piece of Audi’s CSR 2. 1 Audi Environmental Foundation Audi’s duty to the earth and society is an essential piece of the ir Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The most convincing evindence is the Audi Environmental Foundation Ltd. , which makes intentional move in ecological, social and monetary issues by directing and financing research ventures. 2. 2 Environmental Pact for Bavaria and EMASAudi was an author individual from the Environmental Pact for Bavaria, which currently incorporates around 1,350 organizations. The Pact was framed in 1995 as an intentional understanding between the Bavarian business and government to support the earth. The Pact incorporates Audi’s European plants taking an interest in the EC Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS). The motivation behind this is to present a natural administration framework, which improves operational ecological insurance on location. 2. 4 RecognitionBased on the previously mentioned arrangements it very well may be expressed that as a vehicle maker Audi is progressed in advancing maintainability. Audi has additionally gotten acknowledgm ent for this, for example, the 2012 Logistics Sustainability Prize. Audi works tenaciously to improve its picture as a â€Å"green† organization. Audi of America President Johan de Nysschen’s talked at the company’s 100th Anniversary festivity in 2009 (Audi MediaServices, 2009): â€Å"We and our shoppers (likewise) need to drive at something better †a progressively reasonable future.  The organization likewise distributed a business for the 2010 Super Bowl entitled â€Å"Green Police† where they track down Americans who stick to carbon-hostile practices. This was viewed as a difference in showcasing system and it got blended audits. 3. Analysis 3. 1 General analysis towards the car business The appearance of thousands of engine vehicles in huge urban areas has given the contamination issue totally new measurements. Research shows that vehicle fumes contributes half of the (climatic) contaminations in enormous urban communities and adds to the â₠¬Å"Greenhouse effect† raising the Earth’s temperature.Among different producers, Audi has henceforth done advancements of elective force sources, for example, electric and inside ignition motors, which gives them a serious edge. 3. 2 â€Å"Greenwashing† Greenwashingâ is a type of promulgation in Public Relations (PR) where green promoting is misleadingly used to make a figment of an association's points and strategies being earth inviting. Subsequent to distributing their 2010 Super Bowl business â€Å"Green Police† Audi was blamed for greenwashing. Making what is seen as a truly naturally well disposed methodology in the entirety of their practical territories is one of their biggest current challenges.A quote from Jamey Boiter's Brand Innovatr blog (Fast Company, 2010): â€Å"†¦Audi are advancing ††They should focus on this advancement in everything about their brands, from item improvement to correspondences to industry association, t o demonstrate they are not greenwashing. † One of Audi’s qualities is that they have been engaged with dependable activities for a considerable length of time, going back to up to 1960. That being stated, their most noteworthy rivals, for example, BMW and Mercedes Benz are progressively beginning to grasp manageable methodologies, which frames a potential danger to Audi.Conclusions The car business is as yet seen as perhaps the biggest specialist of unfavorable impacts to the earth. Because of buyers getting increasingly advanced and instructed on natural maintainability, the opposition in the business gets progressively extraordinary. It very well may be prescribed for Audi to move their showcasing system significantly more towards manageability and practice item separation to this course at whatever point conceivable. Audi should take a stab at shaking off the â€Å"greenwashing† claims and appearing to be a really mindful corporation.Taking preferred position of the decades’ worth of experience and information that they have accumulated could do this and conceivably gain them a head start from their rivals. Word tally: 1000 Bibliography Abuelsamid, S. 2009. Autobloggreen: Audi to add sun oriented capacity to Ingolstadt factory,(online) Available at: http://green. autoblog. com/2009/12/16/audi-to-add-sun based capacity to-ingolstadt-central station manufacturing plant/(Accessed 21. 11. 2012) Audi AG, 2012. Audi Environmental Foundation Ltd. , (on the web) Available at: http://www. audi-umweltstiftung. de/auws/brand/de. html (Accessed 22. 11. 2012)Audi AG, 2012. Experience: The Audi Sustainability Magazine, (on the web) Available at: http://www. audi-diaries. de/eJournals/mz3/2. 0. 7/index_dialoge_en_2010. html#/0 (Accessed 22. 11. 2012) Audi AG, 2000. Break Review: Environment Report of AUDI AG, (on the web) Available at: http://wip. audi. no/photoalbum/see/? size=org&id=15902&type=1 (Accessed 22. 11. 2012) Audi AG, 2012. V orsprung Durch Technik: Environmental Protection at Audi, (on the web) Available at: http://www. audi. com/com/brand/en/organization/environmental_protection/items/reusing. html#source=http://www. audi. om/com/brand/en/organization/environmental_protection/environmental_protection_at_audi. html&container=page (Accessed 22. 11. 2012) Audi MediaServices, 2012. Official statement: Audi granted the 2012 Logistics Sustainability Prize, (on the web) Available at: https://www. audi-mediaservices. com/distribute/ms/content/en/open/pressemitteilungen/2012/03/16/audi_awarded_the_2012. html (Accessed 21. 11. 2012)â Audi United Kingdom, 2012. : Environment, (on the web) Available at: http://www. audi. co. uk/about-audi/condition. html (Accessed 22. 11. 2012) Audi United Kingdom, 2012. Audi ‘green’ issues and supportability, (on the web) Available at: http://www. udi. co. uk/content/dam/audi/creation/PDF/Fleet/FleetSalesPDF231209/Audi_Green_issues_and_Sustainability_Jan2010. p df (Accessed 21. 11. 2012) Boiter, J. 2010. Quick Company: Can Brands Launch Sustainable Campaigns Without Being Accused of Greenwashing? , (on the web) Available at: http://www. fastcompany. com/1563389/can-brands-dispatch supportable crusades without-being-charged greenwashing (Accessed 21. 11. 2012) Britannica Encyclopedia, 2012. Car Industry, (on the web) Available

Blog Archive Will I Get In And If I Do, Will I Want to Attend After All

Blog Archive Will I Get In And If I Do, Will I Want to Attend After All Not surprisingly, one of the most common questions we receive from MBA candidates is “Will I get in?” Of course, this is an important question to consider before applying, and we suggest that you honestly assess and understand your candidacy and risk profile within the context of your target school’s typical student body before completing or submitting an application to that school. However, once you have determined that you will in fact apply to a particular school, you should not let this question haunt you or halt your progress. Many applicants spend too much time worrying and not enough time working. Your admissions decision is ultimately out of your control, so just focus on submitting the best application you possibly can. The following scenario may be hard for you to imagine when you are still in the midst of applying to business schools, but every year, we at mbaMission see clients get accepted to an MBA program only to realize it is not a place they actually want to attend after all. Alternatively, we occasionally see applicants who are not accepted to  any  school and realize they must remain in a job they were more than ready to leave. So, how do some candidates end up in these kinds of situations? In both of these scenarios, the applicants chose and applied to schools without first taking an  honest  look at their candidacy, goals, and alternatives. We encourage all applicants to very thoroughly consider where their true tipping point lies in terms of attending business school. At what point would  not  going to school be better than going to  X  school? Some candidates feel that if they do not go to Harvard Business School, they may as well not go to business school at all. Others believe they must attend a school in the top ten. Still others think, “I really hope to go to a top ten program, but I’ll be happy to attend any top-30 school.” Having a frank discussion with yourself (or perhaps with us) on this topic may help you pinpoint where this cutoff point is for you. Start by researching all the MBA programs at which you believe you would be competitive, and then organize them into three clusters: dream schools, reasonable schools, and safer schools. Next, further investigate the schools you deemed “reasonable” and “safer,” and as you do so, ask yourself, “Would I rather be at  this  school next year or not be in school at all?” Essentially, we are suggesting that you imagine your worst-case scenarioâ€"not getting into  any  of your dream schoolsâ€"and decide what you would do in that situation. Then, in addition to applying to your dream programs, apply only to those reasonable and safer schools for which you felt going would be preferable to not attending any MBA program at all. This way, you can avoid finding yourself in either of the situations we described at the beginning of this post and instead will be well positioned to embrace the choices you ultimately have. Share ThisTweet Application Tips Blog Archive Will I Get In And If I Do, Will I Want to Attend After All Not surprisingly, one of the most common questions we receive from MBA candidates is “Will I get in?” Of course, this is an important question to consider before applying, and we suggest that you honestly assess and understand your candidacy and risk profile within the context of your target school’s typical student body before completing or submitting an application to that school. However, once you have determined that you will in fact apply to a particular school, you should not let this question haunt you or halt your progress. Many applicants spend too much time worrying and not enough time working. Your admissions decision is ultimately out of your control, so just focus on submitting the best application you possibly can. The following scenario may be hard for you to imagine when you are still in the midst of applying to business schools, but every year, we at mbaMission see clients get accepted to an MBA program only to realize it is not a place they actually want to attend after all. Alternatively, we occasionally see applicants who are not accepted to  any  school and realize they must remain in a job they were more than ready to leave. So, how do some candidates end up in these kinds of situations? In both of these scenarios, the applicants chose and applied to schools without first taking an  honest  look at their candidacy, goals, and alternatives. We encourage all applicants to very thoroughly consider where their true tipping point lies in terms of attending business school. At what point would  not  going to school be better than going to  X  school? Some candidates feel that if they do not go to Harvard Business School, they may as well not go to business school at all. Others believe they must attend a school in the top ten. Still others think, “I really hope to go to a top ten program, but I’ll be happy to attend any top-30 school.” Having a frank discussion with yourself (or perhaps with us) on this topic may help you pinpoint where this cutoff point is for you. Start by researching all the MBA programs at which you believe you would be competitive, and then organize them into three clusters: dream schools, reasonable schools, and safer schools. Next, further investigate the schools you deemed “reasonable” and “safer,” and as you do so, ask yourself, “Would I rather be at  this  school next year or not be in school at all?” Essentially, we are suggesting that you imagine your worst-case scenarioâ€"not getting into  any  of your dream schoolsâ€"and decide what you would do in that situation. Then, in addition to applying to your dream programs, apply only to those reasonable and safer schools for which you felt going would be preferable to not attending any MBA program at all. This way, you can avoid finding yourself in either of the situations we described at the beginning of this post and instead will be well positioned to embrace the choices you ultimately have. Share ThisTweet Application Tips Blog Archive Will I Get In And If I Do, Will I Want to Attend After All Not surprisingly, one of the most common questions we receive from MBA candidates is “Will I get in?” Of course, this is an important question to consider before applying, and we suggest that you honestly assess and understand your candidacy and risk profile within the context of your target school’s typical student body before completing or submitting an application to that school. However, once you have determined that you will in fact apply to a particular school, you should not let this question haunt you or halt your progress. Many applicants spend too much time worrying and not enough time working. Your admissions decision is ultimately out of your control, so just focus on submitting the best application you possibly can. The following scenario may be hard for you to imagine when you are still in the midst of applying to business schools, but every year, we at mbaMission see clients get accepted to an MBA program only to realize it is not a place they actually want to attend after all. Alternatively, we occasionally see applicants who are not accepted to  any  school and realize they must remain in a job they were more than ready to leave. So, how do some candidates end up in these kinds of situations? In both of these scenarios, the applicants chose and applied to schools without first taking an  honest  look at their candidacy, goals, and alternatives. We encourage all applicants to very thoroughly consider where their true tipping point lies in terms of attending business school. At what point would  not  going to school be better than going to  X  school? Some candidates feel that if they do not go to Harvard Business School, they may as well not go to business school at all. Others believe they must attend a school in the top ten. Still others think, “I really hope to go to a top ten program, but I’ll be happy to attend any top-30 school.” Having a frank discussion with yourself (or perhaps with us) on this topic may help you pinpoint where this cutoff point is for you. Start by researching all the MBA programs at which you believe you would be competitive, and then organize them into three clusters: dream schools, reasonable schools, and safer schools. Next, further investigate the schools you deemed “reasonable” and “safer,” and as you do so, ask yourself, “Would I rather be at  this  school next year or not be in school at all?” Essentially, we are suggesting that you imagine your worst-case scenarioâ€"not getting into  any  of your dream schoolsâ€"and decide what you would do in that situation. Then, in addition to applying to your dream programs, apply only to those reasonable and safer schools for which you felt going would be preferable to not attending any MBA program at all. This way, you can avoid finding yourself in either of the situations we described at the beginning of this post and instead will be well positioned to embrace the choices you ultimately have. Share ThisTweet Application Tips Blog Archive Will I Get In And If I Do, Will I Want to Attend After All Not surprisingly, one of the most common questions we receive from MBA candidates is “Will I get in?” Of course, this is an important question to consider before applying, and we suggest that you honestly assess and understand your candidacy and risk profile within the context of your target school’s typical student body before completing or submitting an application to that school. However, once you have determined that you will in fact apply to a particular school, you should not let this question haunt you or halt your progress. Many applicants spend too much time worrying and not enough time working. Your admissions decision is ultimately out of your control, so just focus on submitting the best application you possibly can. The following scenario may be hard for you to imagine when you are still in the midst of applying to business schools, but every year, we at mbaMission see clients get accepted to an MBA program only to realize it is not a place they actually want to attend after all. Alternatively, we occasionally see applicants who are not accepted to  any  school and realize they must remain in a job they were more than ready to leave. So, how do some candidates end up in these kinds of situations? In both of these scenarios, the applicants chose and applied to schools without first taking an  honest  look at their candidacy, goals, and alternatives. We encourage all applicants to very thoroughly consider where their true tipping point lies in terms of attending business school. At what point would  not  going to school be better than going to  X  school? Some candidates feel that if they do not go to Harvard Business School, they may as well not go to business school at all. Others believe they must attend a school in the top ten. Still others think, “I really hope to go to a top ten program, but I’ll be happy to attend any top-30 school.” Having a frank discussion with yourself (or perhaps with us) on this topic may help you pinpoint where this cutoff point is for you. Start by researching all the MBA programs at which you believe you would be competitive, and then organize them into three clusters: dream schools, reasonable schools, and safer schools. Next, further investigate the schools you deemed “reasonable” and “safer,” and as you do so, ask yourself, “Would I rather be at  this  school next year or not be in school at all?” Essentially, we are suggesting that you imagine your worst-case scenarioâ€"not getting into  any  of your dream schoolsâ€"and decide what you would do in that situation. Then, in addition to applying to your dream programs, apply only to those reasonable and safer schools for which you felt going would be preferable to not attending any MBA program at all. This way, you can avoid finding yourself in either of the situations we described at the beginning of this post and instead will be well positioned to embrace the choices you ultimately have. Share ThisTweet Application Tips Business School